COACH WORKSPACE · DANIEL KIM
Analytics
ATHLETE DEEP-DIVE·EKIDEN LOAD MODEL·DEVICE-AGNOSTIC
DK
Daniel Kim
Half Marathon · sub-1:25·No race set·Base phase·GARMIN
ATL · FATIGUE
49
acute · 7-day load
CTL · FITNESS
38
chronic · 42-day load
TSB · FORM
−11
fatigued — watch
RAMP · CTL/WK
AGGRESSIVE+4.6
8-week fitness trend
Planned vs actual load
Bars are what the athlete actually did; the tick is what you prescribed. Hover any week for the gap. Toggle series in the legend.
WINDOW
604530150
-10w-8w-6w-4w-2wnow
BAR COLOUR = ADHERENCEOn plan ≥92%Under 75–91%Well under <75%
This wk actual47
Planned41
Fitness · CTL38
Windowlast 12 weeks
Pace-zone distribution
Easy64%
Tempo20%
Threshold12%
Other4%
Quality share is high for the volume — watch the aggressive ramp.
SESSION ADHERENCE · 4W
76%
9/12
9 of 12 sessions completed in the last 4 weeks.
Heart-rate analysis
Is easy running staying aerobic? Avg easy HR against the athlete's own baseline, plus pace-vs-HR decoupling.
EASY-RUN AVG HR┄ BASELINE 151
Trend vs baseline · 8w-1 bpm
AEROBIC DECOUPLING
+6%
pace vs HR drift · 5 runs
READ
HR is stable; the fast intervals plus a +34% load week are the thing to watch.
Injury & illness log
OVERLAID ON THE LOAD CHART ABOVE
NO EVENTS LOGGED IN THIS WINDOW
Adherence by session type
How closely completed work matched the prescription.
Easy12/14 · 86%
Tempo5/6 · 83%
Intervals4/5 · 80%
Recent sessions
MATCHEDDIVERGEDMISSED
SAT
Intervals
8 × 400 m
8 × 400 m · 78s
Faster than target
THU
Easy
8 km @ 5:05
Missed
Missed
TUE
Tempo
5 km @ 4:15
5.0 km · 4:12
On prescription